Delegates to Congress . Letters of delegates to Congress, 1774-1789, Volume 18, September 1 1781-July 31 1782
Electronic Text Center, University of Virginia Library

| Table of Contents for this work |
| All on-line databases | Etext Center Homepage |

Charles Thomson to To: Meriwether Smith


Sir,
Sept 15. 1781

   You desire to know my Opinion with regard to the sentiments & conduct of Congress in the Advances made to members on Account of their States in the fall of the year 1779. I have examined the journals to assist my recollection. The practice of making advances to individual members was first introduced from necessity & was practised partially & sparingly, afterwards it became so general that most of the members & states seemed to depend upon it. Some of the states seemed at last to disapprove the measure, and as far as I can recollect the members from New Jersey first testified against it. And I well remember that some members seemed pleased with the vote of Congress for stopping farther emissions, as this would naturally put an end to such grants. However money was still granted to members on their application, but it always appeared to me to be given with reluctance after that vote, & the reluctance seemed to



-49-

encrease as the money in the treasury diminished, until at last it produced a regular motion to put a total stop to such advances. This, from the circumstances of individuals who were too far distant from home to receive immediate supplies, was at that time waved. But soon after a recommendation was sent to the states to make provision for their respective delegates.(1) The above is the most succinct & satisfactory account I can give of the matter.

   I am with much respect, Sr., Your Most obedient humble Servt Cha Thomson


Note: RC (Vi: Continental Congress Papers).

1 That is, the states were requested by a resolve of September 29, 1780, "to supply their delegates with money for their support by other means than drawing on the treasury," for which see these Letters, 16:137. As Thomson explained to Smith, the journals contain no indication that Congress took any other formal action on the subject.