|
The
United States Army Yellow Fever Commission
(1900 - 1901)
When Major
Walter Reed and Acting Assistant Surgeons
James Carroll, Aristides Agramonte, and Jesse
Lazear gathered on the porch of the Columbia Barracks Hospital
in June of 1900, they became the fourth successive board of U.S.
medical officers to grapple with the appalling plague that was yellow
fever.
The
persistence of this disease across the Cuban archipelago and its
periodic re-emergence along the coastlines and great river drainages
of the Americas was taking countless thousands of lives. Lack of
precise knowledge as to its cause and transmission had augmented
yellow fever's extraordinarily high mortality rate and had given
rise to quarantine regulations which constituted substantial impediments
to efficient regional trade. Endemic in the tropics, yellow fever
imposed high humanitarian and economic costs upon the entire region.
Specialists regarded Cuba as one of the principal foci of the disease,
and the island consequently attracted considerable attention from
the medical sciences.
In
1879, one year after a devastating epidemic swept up the Mississippi
valley from New Orleans, Tulane University Professor Stanford E.
Chaille led the first investigatory commission to Havana, Rio de
Janeiro, and the West Indies. The Chaille Commission remained in
Havana three months, and its members -- including George Miller
Sternberg, who became Surgeon General of the Army, and Juan Guiteras,
later Director of Public Health for Havana -- consulted with Cuban
scientist Carlos J. Finlay. They concluded
that the causal agent for yellow fever was possibly a living entity
in the atmosphere, an assertion which set Finlay on the path to
the mosquito theory he developed in 1881.
Louis
Pasteur's foundational and highly successful work in modern immunology
in 1880 and 1881 gave a renewed impetus to investigations aimed
at discovering the "yellow fever germ." Over the middle
years of the 1880s several scientists advanced different theories,
all readily refuted by bacteriological work Sternberg undertook
in Brazil and Mexico in 1887 and again in Havana in 1888 and 1889.
In 1897, Italian scientist Giuseppe Sanarelli argued that Bacillus
icteroides was the culprit, and the following year a third scientific
team sailed to Cuba for additional tests. Eugene Wasdin and Henry
D. Geddings appeared to confirm Sanarelli's assertion, though Sternberg,
by then Surgeon General, remained skeptical.
Despite
Wasdin and Geddings' insistence, the B. icteroides theory
garnered significant opposition. In fact, a few months before the
third commission's report reached the public, Walter Reed and James
Carroll -- Reed's assistant at the Columbian University (later George
Washington University) bacteriology laboratories in Washington,
D.C. -- published
a thorough refutation of the icteroides proposal: the bacteria
was not a unique cause of yellow fever, but a variety of the hog
cholera bacillus, "a secondary invader in yellow fever,"
Reed determined, unrelated to its etiology.
[1] Dispute continued, however, and when Sternberg organized
the fourth investigatory board, he charged Reed and his associates
to settle the B. icteroides question once and for all, then
to proceed with analysis of other blood cultures and intestinal
flora from yellow fever cases.
Reed
and Carroll had considerable experience in bacteriological analysis,
and, Sternberg reasoned, might well be able to find the specific
agent of the disease. Aristides Agramonte, a Cuban scientist who
had worked in Reed's lab at the Columbian University in 1898, was
also an accomplished bacteriologist; he had identified B. icteroides
in tissue samples from cases other than yellow fever, providing
further evidence opposed to Sanarelli's thesis. Jesse Lazear, a
scientist from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland,
had joined the Army Medical Corps to study tropical diseases at
their point of origin; he received orders for Cuba in February
1900. Lazear impressed Reed with his abilities when the two men
became acquainted in March. No doubt with Reed's advice, Sternberg
assembled a crack team -- all experienced in scientific research,
but each with interests as diverse as their temperaments. The mix
of talent and personalities generated spectacular results.
What
causes yellow fever? This simple, even obvious question had dictated
yellow fever research for over two decades, and so it guided Reed
in organizing the work of the commission. Bacillus icteroides
and other bacteriological sampling dominated their work for the
first months. "Reed and Carroll have been at that for a long
time," Lazear wrote with some impatience to his wife on August
23, ". . . I would rather try to find the germ without bothering
about Sanarelli." [2] Again and again, tests for the bacteria proved negative, and
at the same time, perplexing cases of yellow fever were developing
in the region. Agramonte and Reed investigated an epidemic at Pinar
del Rio, 110 miles southwest of Havana; Lazear followed later to
collect more specimens, and he also assessed the situation at Guanjay
thirty miles southwest. To "my very great surprise,"
Reed admitted, the specific circumstances of the appearance and
development of these cases gave strong evidence against the widely-accepted
notion that the excreta of patients spread the disease. The theory
of fomites -- infection from contaminated clothing and bedding
-- and indeed even infection from airborne particles seemed altogether
untrue. "At this stage of our investigation," Reed concluded,
". . . the time had arrived when the plan of our work should
be radically changed."
[3] The fundamental question underwent a subtle but critical
transformation: from what causes yellow fever to what transmits
it. A clear and accurate understanding of how the disease was spread
would open a new avenue to its specific cause.

"Personally,
I feel that only can experimentation on human beings serve to clear
the field for further effective work," Reed stated to Surgeon
General Sternberg, who concurred.
[4] Evidence gathering around them pointed strongly to an
intermediate host, and the Commission resolved to test Carlos
Finlay's mosquito theory -- then not generally accepted -- on
human volunteers. Nine times from August 11 to August 25, 1900,
mosquitoes landed on the arms of volunteers and proceeded to feed.
Nine times the results were negative. On August 27, Lazear placed
a mosquito on the doubting Dr. Carroll, and four days later on William
J. Dean, a soldier designated XY in the "Preliminary Note."
[5] Both promptly developed yellow fever. Significantly,
their mosquitoes had fed on cases within the initial three days
of an attack and had been allowed to ripen for at least twelve days
before the inoculations. Carroll vitiated the results of his experimental
sickness by traveling off the post to Havana, a contaminated zone,
even as Reed, ecstatic, wrote from Washington in a confidential
letter: "Did the Mosquito do it?"
[6] Dean's case seemed to prove it, since he claimed not to
have left the garrison before becoming ill. Lazear also developed
a case of yellow fever, almost certainly experimental in origin,
though he never revealed the actual circumstances of his inoculation.
His severe bout of fever took a fatal turn on September 25, 1900.
|

|
Nevertheless,
these results could not have been more dramatic or convincing
for the Commission. Reed quickly assembled a "Preliminary
Note," which he presented to the annual meeting of the
American Public Health Association in Indianapolis, Indiana,
October 23, 1900. After initial consultations in Cuba with
General Leonard Wood, military governor of the island, and
with Surgeon General Sternberg in Washington, he returned
to Cuba with authorization and funding to design and carry
forward a fully defensible series of experiments. His aim
was confirmation of the mosquito theory and invalidation of
the long-held belief in fomites.
|
Camp
Lazear
On
open terrain beyond the precincts of Columbia Barracks -- the American
military base just west of Havana near the adjacent suburban towns
of Quemados and Marianao (also called Quemados de Marianao) -- Reed
established the quarantined experimental station. Camp Lazear,
as the Commission dedicated it, took form in the rolling fields
of the Finca San Jose, on the farm of Dr. Ignacio Rojas, who leased
the land to the Americans. Here Reed designed two small wood-frame
buildings, each 14 by 20 feet, for the experimental work, and nearby
raised a group of seven tents for the accommodation and support
of the volunteers. The buildings faced each other across a small
swale, about 80 yards apart, and stood 75 yards from the tent encampment.
Building Number One, called the Infected Clothing Building, was
a single room tightly constructed to contain as much foul air as
possible. A small stove kept the temperature and humidity at tropical
levels, and carefully attached screening secured the pair of doorways
in a vestibule against intrusion by mosquitoes. Wooden blinds on
two small sealed windows shielded the room from direct sun. Building
Number Two, the Infected Mosquito Building, contained a principal
room, divided into two sections by a floor-to-ceiling wire mesh
screen. A door direct to the exterior let into one section, while
a vestibule with a solid exterior door and pair of successive screened
doors opened to the other, so configured to keep infected mosquitoes
inside that section alone. The spare furnishings in both sections
-- cots with bedding -- were steam sterilized. Windows exposed
the entire room to the clean, steady ocean breezes and to sunlight.
Like the doorways, they were carefully screened. A secondary room
attached to the building but not communicating with the experimental
spaces sheltered the small, heated laboratory where the Commission
members raised and stored the mosquitoes to be used.

These
two experimental buildings presented alternate environments -- one
conspicuously clean and well ventilated, the other filthy and fetid.
Contemporary theories of disease held that yellow fever developed
in unclean conditions, and consequently much time and money had
been devoted to sanitation projects. Workers steamed clothing,
burned sulphur in ships' holds, and thoroughly scrubbed surfaces
with disinfectant. In cases of severe epidemic, entire buildings
presumed to be infected were set afire along with their contents.
Thus the extraordinary -- and intentional -- paradox of the Commission's
experimental regime: Reed expected yellow fever to develop not
in the unsanitary environment, but in the one thought to be most
healthful.
Volunteers
Camp
Lazear went into quarantine the day of its completion, November
20, 1900, with a command of four immune and nine non-immune individuals,
all save one U.S. Army personnel. Soon a group of recent Spanish
immigrants to Cuba augmented the non-immune numbers, bringing the
resident total to about twenty. Reed strictly controlled access
to the camp and ordered regular temperature recording for each volunteer
to eliminate any unanticipated source of infection and to identify
the onset of any case of yellow fever as early as possible. As
a result, non-immunes were barred from returning should they leave
the precinct, and two of the Spaniards who developed intermittent
fevers shortly after arrival were immediately transferred with their
baggage to Columbia Barracks Hospital. The immune members of the
detachment oversaw medical treatments and drove the teams of mules
that pulled supply wagons and the ambulance. Experimentation did
not begin until each volunteer had passed the incubation period
for yellow fever in perfect health.
Reed
took as much care with the design of the experimental protocol as
he had with the configuration of the camp and its buildings. Each
evening, the occupants of the infected clothing building unpacked
trunks and boxes of bed linens and blankets, nightshirts and other
clothing recently worn and soiled by cases from the wards of Columbia
Barracks Hospital and Las Animas Hospital in Havana. These they
shook out and spread around the room to permeate the atmosphere.
The stench was overpowering. Yellow fever causes severe internal
hemorrhaging, and its unfortunate victims often suffer from black
vomit and other bloody discharges. One routine delivery proved
so putrid the volunteers "retreated from the house," Reed
stated. "They pluckily returned, however, within a short time,
and spent the night as usual." [7] In two succeeding trials the protocol became
progressively more daring , as the volunteers then wore the clothing
and slept on the mattresses used by yellow fever patients, and finally
put towels on their bedding smeared with blood drawn from cases
in the early stages of an attack. Each morning, the volunteers
carefully repacked the rank, encrusted materials into boxes and
emerged to an adjacent tent where they spent the day quarantined
from the rest of the company. Three trials of twenty days each
involved seven men altogether, lead by Robert P. Cooke, a physician
in the Army Medical Corps. None developed yellow fever.
The
Commission's mosquito experiments proceeded in four series. First,
Reed sought to demonstrate that mosquitoes of the variety Culex
fasciata (later called Stegomyia fasciata, and later
still Aedes aegypti) could in fact transmit yellow fever,
as Carlos J. Finlay had argued and the
initial experiments at Camp Columbia strongly suggested. Here the
Commission members simply applied infected mosquitoes contained
in test tubes or jars to the skin of the initial volunteers. Success
in these tests raised a number of questions, each one addressed
in the subsequent series:
-
How could a building become infected?
-
When
does a mosquito develop the ability to transmit the disease?
-
Over
what length of time can a mosquito retain this capacity to infect?
The
second series consequently employed the specialized "Infected
Mosquito Building" to indicate how a structure could be considered
infected with yellow fever. This experiment required two groups
of volunteers, one to be inoculated and another to serve as controls.
"Loaded" mosquitoes, as the men called them, were released
into the screened section of Building Two -- on the side with the
protected vestibule entry. One or more non-immune men then entered
the opposite section of the room through the direct exterior door,
and lay down on bunks adjacent to the wire mesh screen in the center
of the room. Now the young man to be inoculated walked through
the vestibule into the mosquito side of the room and proceeded to
lie on a bunk adjacent to the wire screen separating him from the
controls. The inoculation volunteer remained in the building for
about twenty minutes -- enough time to suffer several mosquito bites
-- he then exited to a quarantine tent outside. The controls spent
the remainder of the evening and night in the uninfected side of
the room, and indeed returned to sleep in the room for as many as
eighteen more nights. As Reed stated, absence of yellow fever in
the controls showed "that the essential factor in the infection
of a building with yellow fever is the presence therein of [infected]
mosquitoes," and nothing more. [8] The degree of sanitation, so
long considered critical, was utterly irrelevant.
The
third series of mosquito experiments confirmed what Henry
Rose Carter, of the U.S. Public Health Service, called the "period
of extrinsic incubation," [9] the length of time required for secondary cases of yellow fever
to develop after an initial intrusion of the disease into a locality.
In this series, a single volunteer underwent three successive inoculations
by the same mosquitoes, each group of inoculations interrupted by
a period of time equal in length to the typical incubation period
of the disease in humans, about five days. In this manner, the
volunteer's illness could be specifically attributed to a single
inoculation group. The use of the same mosquitoes and the same
volunteer concurrently demonstrated that no peculiar personal immunity
was at play, since logic dictates that a person susceptible to yellow
fever on day 17 of a mosquito's contamination -- as happened in
the experiment -- could not have been immune to yellow fever on
day 11 or day 4. It was thus only the mosquito's capacity to infect
which changed, and that occurred no less than 11 days after contamination.
The
duration of time over which these "fully ripened" mosquitoes
remained infective comprised the fourth series of experiments.
For this series the Commission kept alive a group of infected mosquitoes
for as long as possible, and proceeded to inoculate three volunteers
-- on the 39th, 51st, and 57th day after contamination. Each developed
yellow fever. A fourth volunteer declined to be bitten on day 65,
and the last two mosquitoes of the group, "deprived of further
opportunity to feed on human blood" [10] expired on day 69 and day
71, clear evidence that even a sparsely populated region may retain
the potential for new infections more than two months after the
first appearance of the disease.
Although
it went unrecorded in the published papers, Reed organized a supplemental
experiment to test another species of mosquito. Culex pungens
failed
to transmit yellow fever to at least one volunteer and probably
to a second. Reed's preliminary conclusions indicated that Culex
fasciata was the only species capable of transmitting yellow
fever. [11]
A
last experimental regime involved subcutaneous injections of blood
from positive cases of yellow fever to presumed non-immunes. Reed
devised these tests to confirm the presence of the yellow fever
agent in the blood of a victim during the first days of an attack,
and, more importantly, to settle the Bacillus icteroides
question. The same blood cultures which produced yellow fever in
four volunteers also failed to grow any B. icteroides, conclusively
invalidating Sanarelli's claim.
Altogether,
the mosquito inoculations and the blood injections produced fourteen
cases of yellow fever. All made a full recovery.
Informed
Consent
Notwithstanding
the decisive medical victory -- as Reed declared, "aside from
the antitoxin of Diptheria & Koch's discovery of the tubercle
bacillus, it will be regarded as the most important piece of work,
scientifically, during the 19th century"
[12] -- success at Camp Lazear unfolded in its own time. Initially,
Reed observed, "the results obtained at this station were not
encouraging." [13] The first inoculations of
four volunteers over a period of two weeks proved disconcertingly
negative each time. Then, on December 5, 1900, private John R.
Kissinger presented his arm to the mosquitoes, and late in the evening
on December 8, suffered the first chills of "a well-marked
attack of yellow fever."
[14] Three more men in rapid succession fell victim to the
insects -- Spanish volunteers Antonio Benigno, Nicanor Fernandez,
and Vicente Presedo. The force of the conclusions was evident to
everyone:
"It
can readily be imagined," Reed empathetically and wryly
described in his first presentation of the experiments, "that
the concurrence of 4 cases of yellow fever in our small command
of 12 nonimmunes within the space of 1 week, while giving rise
to feelings of exultation in the hearts of the experimenters,
in view of the vast importance attaching to these results, might
inspire quite other sentiments in the bosoms of those who had
previously consented to submit themselves to the mosquito's bite.
In fact, several of our good-natured Spanish friends who had jokingly
compared our mosquitoes to 'the little flies that buzzed harmlessly
about their tables,' suddenly appeared to lose all interest in
the progress of science, and, forgetting for the moment even their
own personal aggrandizement, incontinently severed their connection
with Camp Lazear. Personally, while lamenting to some extent
their departure, I could not but feel that in placing themselves
beyond our control they were exercising the soundest judgment."
"In
striking contrast," Reed continued, the anxiety of the
fomites volunteers began to melt into relief. "[T]he
countenances of these men, which had before borne the serious
aspect of those who were bravely facing an unseen foe, suddenly
took on the glad expression of 'schoolboys let out for a holiday,'
and from this time their contempt for 'fomites' could not find
sufficient expression. Thus illustrating once more, gentlemen,
the old adage that familiarity, even with fomites, may breed contempt."
[15]
The
question of human experimentation was indeed a serious one -- unavoidable,
in actuality, as Reed had stated the previous summer to Surgeon
General Sternberg. When the Commission first considered a trial
of Finlay's mosquito theory, Reed, Carroll, and Lazear agreed to
experiment on themselves. Agramonte, a native Cuban, had acquired
immunity as a child. Doubtless Finlay's experience of many unsuccessful
inoculations communicated that positive results would not be forthcoming
rapidly, so before the first series of inoculations began under
Lazear's direction at Columbia Barracks, Reed left Cuba for Washington,
where he completed a monumental report on typhoid fever among the
army corps -- left unfinished by the sudden death of co-author Edward
O. Shakespeare. Carroll and Lazear both sickened while Reed was
in Washington, and Lazear, young and strong, had no reason to anticipate
that his case would be fatal. Reed was shocked at Lazear's death,
and because of his own age -- 49, a decade and a half older than
Lazear and a dozen years older than Carroll -- he resolved not to
inoculate himself when he returned to Cuba on October 4, 1900.
The point had already been amply demonstrated, and only a rigidly
controlled experimental regime would establish the necessary proof.
Carroll, however, remained embittered about this for the remainder
of his life, though he evidently never communicated his objections
directly to Reed.
That
initial series of mosquito inoculations was probably accomplished
without formal documentation of informed consent. Indeed, the experiments
may also have been carried forward without the full knowledge of
the commanding officer of Camp Columbia, and Reed consequently shielded
the identity of Private William J. Dean, the second positive experimental
case, behind the pseudonym "XY" in the "Preliminary
Note." No such potentially troublesome problems arose for
the experimental series at Camp Lazear; Reed obtained prior support
from all of the appropriate authorities in the military and the
administration, even including the Spanish Consul to Cuba. With
the advice of the Commission and others, he drafted what is now
one of the oldest series of extant informed
consent documents. The surviving examples are in Spanish with
English translations, and were signed by volunteers Antonio Benigno
and Vicente Presedo, and a third with the mark of Nicanor Fernandez,
who was illiterate.
The
documents take the form of a contract between individual volunteers
and the Commission, represented by Reed. At least 25 years old,
each volunteer explicitly consented to participate, and balanced
the certainty of contracting yellow fever in the general population
against the risks of developing an experimental case, followed by
expert and timely medical care. The volunteers agreed to remain
at Camp Lazear for the duration of the experiments, and as a reward
for participation would receive $100 "in American gold,"
with an additional hundred-dollar supplement for contracting yellow
fever. These payments could be assigned to a survivor, and the
volunteers agreed to forfeit any remuneration in cases of desertion.
For
the American participants no consent documents appear to survive,
though in contemporary letters Reed assured his correspondents that
the Commission obtained written consent from all the volunteers.
The record of expenses for Camp Lazear -- maintained by Reed's friend
and colleague in the medical corps, Jefferson Randolph Kean -- indicates
that the same schedule of payments for participation and sickness
applied to the Americans as well. Volunteers who participated in
the fomites tests and in addition the later series of blood injections
and the single trial of an alternative species of mosquito also
earned $100 each plus the $100 supplement if yellow fever developed.
Two Americans declined these gratuities, as Kean termed them, Dr.
Robert P. Cooke, of the fomites tests, and John J. Moran, who had
recently received an honorable discharge from the service, and was
the only American civilian to participate. His was the fourth case
of yellow fever to develop from mosquito inoculation. Moran eventually
settled in Cuba, where he managed the Havana offices of the Sun
Oil Company, and late in life became a close friend of Philip S.
Hench. Together the two men rediscovered the site of Camp Lazear
in 1940 -- Building Number One still intact -- and successfully
lobbied the Cuban government to memorialize there the work of Finlay
and the American Commission in the conquest of yellow fever.

Reed
informally commemorated his own experiences at Camp Lazear by commissioning
a group photograph, evidently taken there shortly before he left
Cuba in February 1901. A more important event occurred on the sixth
of that month when Reed presented the results of the Camp Lazear
yellow fever experiments to a great ovation at the Pan-American
Medical Congress in Havana. Three days later he set sail for the
United States, and once landed, drafted the Congress paper as "The
Etiology of Yellow Fever -- An Additional Note," published
immediately in the Journal of the American Medical Association.
[16]

Though
his correspondence intimates a great appreciation for Cuba, Reed
never returned to the warm, sunny shores of the island freed of
a dreadful plague. Carroll stayed behind at Camp Lazear through
February to complete the last experimental series officially bearing
the imprimatur of the Yellow Fever Commission, and returned to Washington
soon after March first. [17] The Medical Corps retained the lease on
Camp Lazear against the possibility of continuing experiments another
season, and Carroll, in fact, returned to Havana in August 1901
for a final experimental series, though he did not make use of Camp
Lazear. This work involved at least three volunteers at Las Animas
Hospital, Havana, who submitted to blood injections. Carroll's
assignment aimed at a greater understanding of the yellow fever
agent, and he proved that blood drawn from active cases of yellow
fever remained virulent even after passing through fine bacteria
filters. In addition, by heating contaminated blood which had previously
caused cases of yellow fever, Carroll rendered it non-infective
-- thereby establishing that this filterable entity, though sub-microscopic,
was demonstrably present in the bloodstream. Carroll wrapped up
the series in October and returned home to stay. [18] In Cuba, J. Randolph Kean made the last
rental payments to Signore Rojas on October 9, 1901, and Camp Lazear,
for more than a generation, slipped out of the realm of memory.
[1] Walter Reed and James Carroll, "Bacillus Icteroides
and Bacillus Cholerae Suis -- A Preliminary Note," Medical
News (29 April 1899), reprinted in: United States Senate Document
No. 822, Yellow Fever, A Compilation of Various Publications
(Washington: Government Printing Office, 1911), p. 55.
[2] Letter from Jesse W. Lazear to Mabel Houston Lazear,
23 August 1900, Philip S. Hench Walter Reed Yellow Fever Collection,
Claude Moore Health Sciences Library, Department of Historical
Collections and Services, accession number: 00341001.
[3] Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in United States
Senate Document No. 822, Yellow Fever A Compilation of Various
Publications (Washington: Government Printing Office, 1911),
p. 94.
[4] Letter from Walter Reed to George M. Sternberg,
24 July 1900, Hench Reed Yellow Fever Collection, accession number:
02064001.
[5]Walter Reed, James Carroll, Aristides Agramonte,
Jesse W. Lazear, "The Etiology of Yellow Fever -- A Preliminary
Note," Proceedings of the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting
of the American Public Health Association Indianapolis, Indiana,
22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 October 1900.
[6] Letter from Walter Reed to James Carroll, 7 September
1900, Edward Hook Additions to the Philip S. Hench Walter Reed
Yellow Fever Collection: James Carroll Papers, Claude Moore Health
Sciences Library, Department of Historical Collections and Services,
accession number: 15312004. The originals of these letters remain
in a private collection.
[7] Walter Reed, James Carroll, Aristides Agramonte,
"The Etiology of Yellow Fever -- An Additional Note,"
Journal of the American Medical Association 36 (16 February
1901): 431-440, reprinted in: Senate Document No. 822, p. 84.
[8]Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in Senate Document
No. 822, p. 99.
[9] Henry Rose Carter, "A Note on the Spread of
Yellow Fever in Houses, Extrinsic Incubation," Medical
Record 59 (15 June 1901) 24: 937.
[10]Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in Senate Document
No. 822, p. 101.
[11]Culex fasciata was reclassified shortly
after the experiments as Stegomyia and later became Aedes
aegypti.
[12] Letter to from Walter Reed to Emilie Lawrence
Reed, 9 December 1900, Hench Reed Collection, accession number:
02231001.
[13]Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in Senate Document
No. 822, p. 97.
[14]Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in Senate Document
No. 822, p. 98.
[15]Walter Reed, "The Propagation of Yellow Fever
-- Observations Based on Recent Researches," in Senate Document
No. 822, p. 99.
[17] The Commission reported these concluding experiments
in: Walter Reed, James Carroll, Aristides Agramonte, "Experimental
Yellow Fever," American Medicine II (6 July 1901)
1: 15-23.
[18]Walter Reed, James Carroll, "The Etiology
of Yellow Fever (A Supplemental Note)," American Medicine
III (22 February 1902) 8: 301-305.
|